Laisiangtho mun khat leh mun khat kitukalh cih bang a om thei ding hiam?
Laisiangtho i cih Pasian’ humuapna tawh hong kipia hi-a (2 Tim. 3:16), Khasiangtho’ makaihna tawh a kigelh ahih manin (2 Pet. 1:21) thu khat-in luangin a kitukalh cih bang om lo hi. Piangthak-a Laisiangtho a um mite bel hih bang thu peuh tawh buai khol lo a, ahi zongin mi pawlkhatte in up nading sangin up loh nading lam-in thu gengen thei uh ahih manin i upna ah i kip mahmah ding thupi hi.
A peuhmah-in “kitukalh” i cih bang hi mawka bang hangin mi pawlkhat in Laisiangtho sung ah a kitukalh thu pawlkhat om hi, ci thei mawkmawk uh ahi hiam? cih zong theih huai peuhmah hi. “Kitukalh” i cih pen Mangkam-in “contradict, contradictory, contradiction” kici a, tanglai pek pana kizang kammal khat ahi hi. Hih kammal a kizat simin hih kammal’ khiatna a telgen masapen Greek mipil Aristotle’ genna ngaihsut huai hi.
Aristotle (384-322 BC) in “kitukalh” i cih ciangin, “a kibang mi khat adingin a kibang na khat a kibang hun leh a kibang thu ah hi napi-in hi lo cih bang hi thei lo hi” (that the same thing should at the same time be and not be for the same person and in the same respect is impossible) ci-in na gen hi (Aristotle, Metaphysics, iv 1005b 18-20, as quoted in William Arndt, Bible Difficulties and Seeming Contradictions, Eds. Robert G. Hoerber and Walter R. Roehrs [St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1987], 126). 1920 kum-a kikhen Standard Dictionary in “kitukalh” i cih pen “thu khatpeuh maan lah maan khial lah khial cih bang om thei lo hi” (the same proposition cannot be both true and false) ci-in siangtakin na gen hi (Ibid).
A mi ngaihsut kul hi. Gentehna-in, Sawltakte’ Tangthu 12:1-2 ah, Herod in Sawltakpi James’ ngawngtan-in that hi, ci hi. Sawltakte’ Tangthu 15:13-21 ah tua Jerusalem Council kikhopna ah thugenpi khat pen James hi leuleu ahih manin pawlkhatte in tel haksa uh hi. A mi kibang lo hi. A masa James pen Sawltakpi 12 laka khat hi a, John tawh a unau, Zebedee’ tapa ahi hi. James nihna pen bel i Topa’ sanggampa hi a, Joseph leh Mary-te’ tapa ahi hi. Matt. 13:55 leh Mark 6:3 te ah kitel mahmah hi. James’ Laikhak gelhpa zong hi lai hi. Jude’ Laikhak gelhpa tawh unau uh ahi hi.
A hun ngaihsut kul hi. Gentehna-in, Piancialna 1 ah leitung a kipiansak lai-in kicing mahmah-in hoih mahmah hi, ci napi-in Piancilna 6 i sim ciangin leitung sia lua mahmah-in mawhna leh siatna vive tawh kidim leuleu hi. A bangci ahi tam? Piancilna 1 ah leitung ah mawhna hong lut ma hun lai-a leitung a hoihna a kigen hi a, Piancil 3 ah mihingte hong mawh uh a, leitung ah mawhna leh siatna dim ta hi. Piancil 6 ngawngaw ciangin bel mawhna leh siatna kithuak zo nawn lo a, tuiciin-a sawpsiang ding ciang hong tung ta hi. A hun et kul hi.
A thu ngaihsut kul hi. A kigen thu a kibang mah ahi hiam? Gentehna-in, Matthew 11:14 ah Zeisu Khazih in, “Amah sang nuam hi le uh cin, a hong pai dinga kigen Elijah ahi hi” ci-in Tuiphumpa John’ thu na gen hi. Tuiphumpa John leuleu in Jerusalem pan-a hong pai mite in “Elijah” na hi hiam? ci-a a dot uh ciangin “Ka hi kei hi” ci-in na dawng kik ngiat hi (John 1:21).
A bangci ahi tam? A thu kibang lo hi. I Topa’ gen pen Malachi 4:5 a kigenkhol Elijah hi a, John pen tua pa hi takpi hi. Ahih hangin Jerusalem pan-a hong pai mite’ gen Elijah pen tanglai a kamsang Elijah hi mawka, John in tua pa ahih lohna a pulaak hi lel hi. Kitukalh dek lo hi. “A kibang thu” hi lo hi. Elijah veve, tanglai-a kamsang Elijah leh a kigenkhol Elijah-te’ thu a kigen ahih manin khat leh khat kitulkalh dek lo uh hi.
Tua ahih leh, Laisiangtho sung ah a kitukalh thu pawlkhat om hi a ci mite in tua thute limtak encian takpi-in tuate “a kibang thu ah” (in the same sense) kituak lo-in kitukalh takpi hiam, cih a kan phat mahmah ding uh thupi ding hi. Gentehna-in, Khatveivei a thu a la a cinga a kigen loh manin, Jericho khua gei a mittawte a kidamsakna ah, mun khat ah mittaw khat ci-a, mun khat ah mi nih a cih zelna (Matt. 20:30; Mark 10:46; Luke 18:35) leh Jericho khua sungah a lut laitak uh ci zel na pi-a (Luke 18:35) mun khat ah a pai khiat laitak uh a cih zelnate (Mark 10:46; Luke 19:1) bangin Laisiangtho amah leh amah a kitukalh ding tawh a kibat hun om thei mah hi.
Jericho kici khuapi khat bek om lo a, tanglai khuapi leh tua hun lai-a khuapi ci-in khuapi nih na om hi. Khuapi khat panin Zeisu Khazih a pusuah laitakin a khat pen ah a lut hi gige hi. Tua ahih manin Jericho khua khat bek hi leh a kitukalh ding hi mah a, ahih hangin khua khat bek kigen hi lo a, khua kibang lo nih, khat pan pusuakin khat ah lut, cih thu ahih manin, “a kibang na khat a kibang hun leh a kibang thu ah hi napi-in hi lo cih bang” hi lo a, a hun kibang lo, a thu kibang lo, khuapi nih, a lui leh a thak cih thu ahi hi. Kitukalh lo hi.
Tua ban-ah, mun khat ah khutdawhngen khat ci napi-in mun khat ah nih, a cihna tawh kisai-in tua munte a kitukalh uh hiam? Kitukalh kilkel lo hi. Bang hang? Khat in khutdawhngen “nih” a gen hi a, a dang mun pen in tuate’ laka “khat” a gen hi lel hi. Khutdawhngen “khat” om hi a ci pen in “nih hi lo hi, khat bek hi” ci lian hi leh bel a kitukalh suak ding hi. John 20:12 ah thawhkik ni zingsangin i Topa’ han ah vantungmi “nih” kimu ci a, Mark 16:5 in lah “khat” a cih zel tawh a kibang ahi hi. Khat a ci pen in nih om kei, khat bek hi, ci hi leh kitukalh ding hi, ama’n bangzah bangzah a om zong in khat’ thu a gen hi lel hi.
Tua ban-ah, Laisiangtho kitukalh hi, i cih mawkmawk ciangin i tel loh luatna peuh kilang thei gige zawlai hi. A diakdiakin a kigelhcilna Hebrew leh Greek-te thei lopi-a mawk ciakciak mi pawlkhat om thei uh hi. Gentehna-in, Sawltakte’ Tangthu 9:7 ah, “Amah tawh zin khawm mite pau lo-in a om uh hi: awging za napi-in bangmah mu lo uh hi” ci hi. Sawltakte’ Tangthu 22:9 leuleu ah Paul in, “Kei tawh a om khawm mite in khuavak a muh hangin kei’ tunga thu hong gen pa’ aw a za kei uh hi” a cih ciangin pawlkhatte in hih mun ah Laisiangtho kitukalh ei, ci uh hi.
Ahih hangin a kigelhna Greek a theite in tua ci ngaihsut lo uh hi. Sawltakte’ Tangthu 9:7 ah “za” cih kammal pen Greek kampau-in akouo hi a ‘genitive-a’ kizang ahi hi. Sawltakte’ Tangthu 22:9 leuleu ah hih akouo cih kammal mah ‘accusative-a’ kizang ahi hi. A khiatna kilamdang mahmah hi. Genitive-a a kizat ciangin ‘aw’ khat kiza, a za mite’ bil ah ‘aw’ khat ging, cihna ahi hi. Accusative-a a kizat ciangin ‘aw’ mawkmawk khat kiza cihna hi nawn lo a, a za mite in a khiatna a theih uh ‘aw’ khat kiza cihna ahi hi. Hih mun nih kitukalh zenzen lo hi (William Arndt, Bible Difficulties and Seeming Contradictions, 129).
A kiciangtan lua mahmah mihingte’ theihna peuh bulphuh-in kitukalh ngei lo a a khial ngei lo Pasian’ Kammal khawng i mawhsak mawkmawk loh ding thupi mahmah ding hi. Tua sangsik-in, kiniamkhiatna leh ki-apna lungsim tawh Ama’ mai ah bok-in, “A tawntung, a si thei lo, a kimu thei lo Kumpipa leh Amah bek a pil Pasian” in a kamsangte zangin khialhna kihel lo Ama’ Kammal hong pia khin ahih manin, “pahtawina leh minthanna om tawntung hen, Amen” (Romans 16: 27) ci-a ama’ tungah lungdam i kohkoh ding ahi hi.
(2003 kum December kha-a ka bawl Dotna-Dawnna 425 a pha Laisiangtho Thuhaksate kici laibu puahpha-a behlap tawh thuah-a ka sepsepna-a dotna leh dawnna khat hi. ZKK)
Comment piaknop aomleh...